Thanks =D.
I decided to took the tests myself since the reviews on..most of the websites like those in Download.com and other "reviews websites" seems ...sugar-coated or "being paid", and it seems the tests conducted by them..kinda...biased as well.
Also, when checking on Avast's website, I stumbled upon this, on their blog.
Quote:
|
I ran this report past our virus lab people and they just laughed and said “Pay us, give us a little time and we will set up the respected and independent ‘Vince’s Technology Lab’ to get you whatever results you want.” I took them up on their offer—I promised them a bonus and told them I wanted a test where we got a 100% score and Norton got 0%. An hour later they had 40 javascript infections from today that we catch and Norton does not:
|
avast! blog » Can testing paid for by an AV company be trusted?
That means...if you "paid" them for the reviews/tests...you'll get what the results you wanted.
Also, Symantec on "free antivirus"
-
Symantec: it’s dangerous to rely on free antivirus - TECH.BLORGE.com
Dangerous? Then how come my personal tests that Avast, which is a
FREE ANTIVIRUS performs better than Norton Antivirus?
There you guys got it.